top of page

Rhetorical Analysis Essay

A rhetorical analysis examines how an author or speaker uses diction to influence an audience. It involves analyzing the techniques, strategies, and styles used in a piece of writing or speech to understand how they contribute to their purpose. This type of analysis focuses on elements such as word choice, structure, arguments, and appeals to emotion, logic, or credibility to evaluate how effectively a message communicates its intended purpose. When writing a rhetorical analysis, it is important to consider a variety of factors. We were given a SPACECAT sheet , which helped us identify and ask the correct questions in order to effectively complete a rhetorical analysis. The rhetorical analysis essay was quite challenging for me, as I had never worked with rhetoric or analyzing texts in such a complex and thoughtful way before. However, once I became familiar with this sort of analysis, I noticed myself being able to understand situations better, reflect on my own feelings more thoughtfully, and engage in more complex conversations.

As part of preparation for our rhetorical analysis essay, we were assigned to craft a series of precis on a variety of texts. A precis is a concise summary that mandates a clear exposition of the author's identity, argument, purpose, development of argument, and the target audience. Through these precis, we were able to understand what rhetorical analysis is and learn about several ways that a writer or speaker engages with their audience to prove their message. Additionally, to help us better comprehend rhetorical analysis, we were asked to compile a list of new vocabulary we found in the text, formulate discussion questions pertinent to the text, and select notable quotes. In my precis, it is evident that I was grappling with the concept of rhetorically analyzing a text and the intricacies of articulately explaining the progression of a text. 

CLOSE READ:

My first attempt:

My first attempt to explain Staples' choice to incorporate a specific anecdote was extremely superficial and lacked thoughtful analysis. Not only did I lack a necessary explanation of HOW or WHY Staples incorporated this quote and these rhetoric devices, but I did not address the intended audience or the significance of his choices. This attempt was very basic and I did not have a clear grasp of rhetorical analysis. 

My FInal result:

Screen Shot 2024-04-10 at 8.08.48 PM.png

In my final result, it is evident that I had a much clearer understanding of the significance of Staples' choices to incorporate a specific anecdote in his writing, along with his purpose for doing so, who he was hoping to reach with this, and how it influenced his writing. This final attempt is significantly more robust and more thoughtful than before.

Examining my growth:

It is evident that I experienced significant growth as a writer from my first draft to my final draft, as I provided more depth and perception, recognized the specific audience, and engaged with the text. My first attempt touches on the use of ethos and pathos but does so in a superficial manner, not delving into how these rhetorical devices are specifically employed or the reason for doing so. My final writing, however, offers a detailed analysis of how the author connects with his audience, the emotions he evokes, and his purpose for doing so. This shows a more sophisticated understanding of rhetorical strategies and a greater ability to discuss their use in a nuanced way. Additionally, in my first attempt, I generally mentioned rhetorical devices but did not connect them to the intended audience at all. A critical component to consider when analyzing texts is who the intended audience is and what the author wants from them. In my final draft, it is evident that I was able to recognize this, as I explicitly identify white women as the target audience and describe how Staples' rhetorical strategies are tailored to impact them. This shows an enhanced ability to analyze and articulate the relationship between the text, the author, and the intended audience. Lastly, my final draft shows a much more meaningful and engaged interaction with the text. I critically examined the mechanisms of Staples evoking feelings from his audience and evaluated the effectiveness of doing so. If I could make one last revision to this specific paragraph, I would attempt to emphasize exactly what aspect of Staples' experience he seeks empathy about. In doing so, I would create an even more meticulous and detailed analysis of his text.  

Strengths

I am very proud of my final draft, as it marked my first successful foray into rhetorical analysis, completed in a very short period of time. This essay analyzes Brent Staples' text, focusing on his rhetorical strategies and how they function to engage with his audience and convey the pervasive issues of racial profiling. This essay shows a strong engagement with the text, providing detailed citations and a thorough examination of the text. Prior to this essay, I had never considered how authors strategically tailor their writing to resonate with specific audiences. Completing this essay has equipped me with a valuable set of analytical skills that enhance my understanding of texts and their broader causes, which is effectively demonstrated in my essay. 

Weaknesses

I hate when writing sounds overly repetitive, and I think that this essay is an example of that repetitiveness. This essay frequently reiterates the same points about including empathy and challenging stereotypes with anecdotes. I often failed to introduce new insights or progress my argument, and I think that this weakness detracts from the impact of my essay. 

bottom of page